Patience and a focus on the long run

Patience and a focus on the long run

By James Parkyn - PWL Capital - Montreal

How to invest the Warren Buffett way—lessons from the latest Berkshire letter

Warren Buffett’s letters to shareholders are always packed with brilliant investing wisdom and fascinating insights. And this year’s is no different.

Buffett is the world’s most famous stock investor for a good reason. He grew a struggling New England textile manufacturer into a massive conglomerate that today is the seventh-largest U.S. company by market value—over $870 billion as of mid-June. Along the way, Buffett has used the annual Berkshire Hathaway shareholder letter to document the nuts and bolts of his success since 1965.

At PWL, we like to follow Buffett because we share his focus on a long-term investor’s mindset—meaning buying and holding as long as it is sensible to do so. I also talk about Buffett’s most recent shareholder letter in my latest Capital Topics podcast with François Doyon La Rochelle

Charlie Munger was Berkshire’s “architect”

Buffett started this year’s letter with a loving tribute to his longtime friend and business partner Charlie Munger, who died in November just 33 days shy of his 100th birthday.

Buffett, 93, describes Munger as his “part older brother, part loving father” who repeatedly “jerked me back to sanity when my old habits surfaced.” Munger was the “architect” of Berkshire, while Buffett “acted as the ‘general contractor’ to carry out the day-by-day construction of his vision. Charlie never sought to take credit for his role as creator but instead let me take the bows and receive the accolades,” he writes.

“Though I have long been in charge of the construction crew; Charlie should forever be credited with being the architect.”

Apple gains illustrate strategy

The Berkshire philosophy based on Munger’s vision is simple. Success comes from patiently riding out market volatility and holding positions for the long term, not trying to time the market.

Berkshire’s investment in Apple is a great example illustrating the approach. Berkshire came to Apple fairly late, buying its initial position only in 2016 and purchasing $36 billion (figures in USD) of Apple stock over the next three years. The investment paid off astonishingly well. As of May, Berkshire’s stake had soared in value to $157 billion, the Wall Street Journal reported .

“Berkshire is sitting on about $120 billion in paper gains, likely the most money ever made by an investor or a firm from a single stock. Nothing in Buffett’s long career comes close,” the newspaper said.

Berkshire has made an annualized return of over 26% from Apple including dividends—compared to a 12.9% gain for the S&P 500 during the same period.al-gains taxes will be a disincentive. Given Canada’s deepening productivity woes, it is precisely the wrong policy.”

Stock-picking “harder than you would think”

Buffett’s Apple investment shows the value of holding for the long run and ignoring the short-term volatility that the stock has seen over the years.

At the same time, lest anyone come away thinking the Apple story is a great argument for stock-picking, Buffett warns strongly against such a conclusion.

“Within capitalism, some businesses will flourish for a very long time while others will prove to be sinkholes,” he writes. “It’s harder than you would think to predict which will be the winners and losers. And those who tell you they know the answer are usually either self-delusional or snake-oil salesmen.”

Upside limited

Buffett’s letter includes a good example of the risks of stock-picking. He describes “severe earnings disappointment” at Berkshire Hathaway Energy—the company’s 100%-owned utilities and energy investment, which encountered significant regulatory and other issues last year.

Buffett acknowledges that he and his partners “did not anticipate or even consider” these issues and “made a costly mistake in not doing so.”

And despite Berkshire’s own meteoric growth, he warns that the gains aren’t likely to repeat in future: “We have no possibility of eye-popping performance.” The company is in a way a victim of its own success; as Buffett has warned in the past, “A high growth rate eventually forges its own anchor.”

“Patience pays”

Buffett himself is famous for suggesting that investors invest passively and broadly for the long term and avoid investment funds with high fees. As he puts it in his shareholder letter, “Patience pays.”

At PWL, we couldn’t agree more. Our own approach is to invest passively in a broadly diversified portfolio using evidence-based strategies. And this has meant that through our ownership of broad index funds, we’ve owned Apple stock even longer than Warren Buffett!

An investor’s mindset, a long-term focus, patience—the essence of what Buffett calls his “common sense” approach rooted in his birthplace of Omaha, Nebraska—are ideas we can all benefit from.

Find more commentary and insights on personal finance and investing in our past blog posts, eBooks and podcast on the website of PWL Capital’s Parkyn-Doyon La Rochelle team and on our Capital Topics website.

Read more about Charlie Munger in the book Poor Charlie’s Almanac: The Wit and Wisdom of Charles T. Munger, now in its fourth edition.

TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE EXPERTISE OF JAMES PARKYN, Portfolio Manager at PWL Capital Montreal to determine the best solution for you.

Remember these lessons from market history to build your wealth

Remember these lessons from market history to build your wealth

By James Parkyn

Readers of this blog will know the importance we give to taking a long-term perspective on the markets.

That’s why each year we review the summary of the UBS Global Investment Returns Yearbook. The yearbook is a remarkable resource that looks at historical returns from 35 global markets back to 1900.

This year’s edition is the 25th. Historically, it was published by the Credit Suisse Research Institute and authored in collaboration with Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton of the London Business School and Elroy Dimson of Cambridge University. We’re grateful that UBS decided to continue its production and the collaboration with its authors after merging with Credit Suisse in 2023.

One of the topics explored in this year’s edition is investment risk and the extremes of global market performance—both good and bad—dating back to 1900.

Investors take risk to earn returns, but sometimes market volatility can test the nerves of even the most experienced investor. That was certainly the case in 2022, one of the worst years for stock and bond returns.

Indeed, the yearbook shows that U.S. government bond performance in 2022 adjusted for inflation was the worst since 1900 by a margin of about 15 percentage points. The real return for U.S. bonds was about -35% versus an average historical return of 2.2%. Unfortunately, stock returns were also dismal in 2022. The U.S. stock market generated a real return of about -30% versus an average of 8.4%.

It’s unusual for bonds to be more volatile than stocks as we see in the data provided by the yearbook. The six worst episodes for stock market investors were the 1929 Wall Street crash and Great Depression, the 1973-74 oil shock and recession, the popping of the dot.com bubble in 2000-02 and the global financial crisis of 2008-09.

Since the turn of the century, we’ve had our fair share of tough times. The yearbook notes: “In its 24-year life, the 21st century already has the dubious honor of hosting four bear markets, two of which ranked among the four worst in history.”

While this observation is enough to give any investor pause about the riskiness of stocks, it’s important keep sight of two lessons from market history.

First, stocks have always recovered from bear markets and gone on to reach new highs. However, the time to recovery has varied greatly.

In the U.S. stock market—by far the largest in the world—the recovery has occurred in a matter of months, as was the case after the COVID bear market of 2020, or over a period of years, especially if inflation is taken into account.

For example, after the tech bubble burst in March 2000, it took seven and a half years from the start of the bear market to full recovery in July 2007. Soon after, the financial crisis hit, causing another collapse. This time, it took four years for the market to recover. Together, the two bear markets made up what’s know as the lost decade in U.S. stocks.

The second lesson is that the good times in the stock market tend to last longer than the bad times and generate much better gains than the losses experienced during bear markets. The yearbook provides data on four “golden ages” for the stock market investors, each covering a decade. They were the recoveries following the first and second world wars, the expansionary 1980s and the 1990s tech boom.

Real equity returns in the 1980-89 period were 357% in the U.S. market and 247% globally. The 1990-99 tech boom produced 276% gain in the U.S. and 114% globally (a number dragged down by poor performance in Japan). The conclusion? To participate in market recoveries and benefit from the good times, you must remain invested through the shorter, but painful bad times.

As we saw in a recent blog post, stocks are not risk-free even over long periods, but they give you the best chance to outpace inflation and increase your wealth in real terms. Global diversification and disciplined rebalancing will soften the blow of negative periods in the markets and allow you to enjoy the longer, more profitable upsides.

If you’ve been investing for some time, you’ve already experienced both good and bad periods in the markets. When the next bear market occurs, it’s important to recall market history as well as your own personal experience. Those reflections will help give you the confidence to remain patient and avoid missing the next upswing.

For more commentary and insights on investing and personal finance, be sure to listen to our latest Capital Topics podcast and subscribe to never miss an episode. And download your free copy of our popular eBook Seven Deadly Sins of Investing. bscribe to never miss an episode.

How to avoid being tricked by hindsight bias

How to avoid being tricked by hindsight bias

By James Parkyn

In late 2021, Wall Street Journal personal finance columnist Jason Zweig asked readers to guess how several financial markets would perform in the year to come as well as where interest rates would at the end of the year.

The following December, Zweig surveyed the same readers again. This time, he asked them to try to recall what they’d predicted the previous year. Then, he compared their recollections to what actually happened in 2022.

He called this little quiz the Hindsight Bias Buster, so it should come as no surprise that readers were way off when they tried to remember what they’d predicted a year earlier.

You will recall that 2022 was a terrible year for investors, marked by soaring interest rates and double-digit losses in both the U.S. stock and bond markets. When Zweig’s readers thought back to their predictions, they remembered being far less bullish at the start the year than they actually had been in real time.

The reason for the discrepancy can be attributed to what behavioural psychologists call hindsight bias. It’s when your knowledge of what actually happened shapes your beliefs about what you’d predicted would happen. As Zweig explains: “It makes us all think we had a better idea of how the past year would unfold than we really did—which, in turn, makes us more confident in our hunches about this year than we probably should be.”

Let’s see how this might play out with regard to the year just past and this year. After a strong 2023 in the markets, it may be difficult to remember that many observers were making gloomy predictions at the beginning of the year. Back then, they forecast that high interest rates would cause a recession that would, in turn, hurt the markets. In fact, the economy proved highly resilient and the prospect of falling interest rates sparked a massive stock market rally at year-end.

Today, it would be natural to fool yourself into thinking you knew all along that the markets would bounce back in 2023. And this distorted hindsight could cause you to become overconfident in guessing how 2024 will unfold. However, the bottom line, as we often remind readers, is that we have no way of predicting what the future holds.

A closely related psychological pitfall to hindsight bias is recency bias. It’s the tendency to give more weight to occurrences in the recent past. For example, a soaring U.S. stock market in the last year might lead you to want to bail out of other global markets and put all your chips into equities south of the border.

If we look further back in the history, we will see the danger of this kind of thinking. For example, following the exceptional run-up in the U.S. market during the dot.com era of the 90s, investors suffered through 2000-2009, a period that came to be known as “the lost decade” for U.S. stocks. In those years, the S&P 500 Index recorded one of its worst 10-year performances with an annualized compound return of minus 0.95%, according to Dimensional Fund Advisors.

What can we say about 2024 without making predictions? Higher interest rates have brightened the long-term picture for investors. Of course, that doesn’t necessarily mean 2024 will be a positive year for stocks or bonds, but as Vanguard noted in its 2024 outlook: “For well-diversified investors, the permanence of higher real interest rates is a welcome development. It provides a solid foundation for long-term risk-adjusted returns.”

The antidote to both hindsight bias and recency bias is a sound financial plan built upon a broadly diversified portfolio that reflects your risk tolerance. Then, your job is to remain invested through good times and bad, patiently allowing the markets to do their work over time.

For more commentary and insights on investing and personal finance, be sure to listen to our latest Capital Topics podcast and subscribe to never miss an episode. And download your free copy of our popular eBook Investing Life Skills for Early Savers. It’s designed for young people starting out on their investing journey but its tips apply to investors of every age.

Here’s a better way to think about risk

by James Parkyn

Our job as investment advisors and portfolio managers is to capture returns from global capital markets while controlling portfolio risk. We do this by maximizing diversification, minimizing costs and seeking to make portfolios as tax efficient as possible.

A critical element in this work is matching portfolio risk to our clients’ risk tolerance. Your tolerance for risk depends not only on how comfortable you are with uncertainty, but also your capacity to take risk given your age, financial situation and life goals.

Last spring, Ken French, in association with Dimensional Fund Advisors, published an essay entitled Five Things I Know About Investing. French, a professor at Dartmouth College, is a giant in the world of finance who is best known for his work with Nobel Prize winner Eugene Fama.

The first part of his essay deals with risk. French proposes a definition of risk that steers clear of such technical concepts as volatility, standard deviation and beta. Instead, he defines risk as “uncertainty about lifetime consumption.”

He explains that people invest because they want to use their wealth in the future to achieve important goals like enjoying financial security, supporting the people and causes they care about and retiring comfortably. Risk is uncertainty about how much wealth it will take to achieve those lifetime goals.

“Some might plan to spend all the money on themselves for things like food, shelter, travel, recreation and medical care,” French says. “Others may plan to spend some of their wealth on political contributions, charitable donations, or gifts and bequests to their children…Investors like a high expected return because it increases the expected wealth that will be available to spend or give away. And everything else the same, risk averse investors prefer less uncertainty about their future wealth.”

In this light, the financial author Morgan Housel makes some important observations in his book The Psychology of Money about how risk and unforeseen events can jeopardize your future wealth.

“A plan is only useful if it can survive reality,” Housel writes in this excerpt from his book. “And a future filled with unknowns is everyone’s reality.”

According to Housel, surviving future unknowns to build wealth for lifetime consumption comes down to three things.

• First, more than big returns, you want to be financially unbreakable. In other words, you don’t want to take the kind of risks that will deplete your wealth and prevent you from benefitting from the power of compounding over the long term.

• Second, the most important part of your financial plan is to be prepared for things not to go as planned. You only have to think about the pandemic, the war in Ukraine or rising interest rates to know you should expect the unexpected. “Room for error – often called margin of safety – is one of the most underappreciated forces in finance. It comes in many forms: A frugal budget, flexible thinking and a loose timeline – anything that lets you live happily with a range of outcomes.”

• Third, Housel writes it’s vital to have a “barbelled personality” – optimistic about the future, but paranoid about what will prevent you from getting there. According to Housel, sensible optimism is a belief that odds are in your favour for things to work out over time even if you know there will be difficulties along the way. To make it to that optimistic future, you have to make prudent decisions and stay the course when things are looking bleak.

I encourage you to read Ken French’s essay to benefit from his other observations about investing. I also invite you to download the latest episode of our Capital Topics podcast where we discuss French’s essay in more detail.  

Ask yourself this simple question before changing your portfolio

by James Parkyn

We know from the field of behavioural finance that people tend to feel the pain of losses much more deeply than the joy of gains. That’s why a bear market like the one we’ve experienced this year can be so hard to take.

When the markets become turbulent, most investors know they should keep a tight rein on their emotions. But in the heat of the action, when markets are sinking, it’s not easy.

There’s just so much uncertainty. You don’t know how bad the bear market will get or how long it will last. And don’t look to the media for help. Stock market commentators tend to focus on the negative and trot out clichés like “It’s a stock-pickers market” or “Buy and hold is dead.”

These bromides encourage people to trade their investments, but if you’re tempted to veer away from your long-term financial plan, ask yourself one simple question: Then what?

Once you make the decision to sell stocks to avoid further losses, what comes next? At some point, you will have to buy back into the market. But how will you know when it’s safe? In the meantime, you risk missing out on returns when the markets rebound.

Or you might be persuaded to purchase an actively managed mutual fund based on its past performance. However, we know that only 18% of actively managed Canadian equity funds outperformed their benchmark over the 10 years to December 2021, according to the S&P SPIVA Canada Scorecard. Actively managed U.S. and international funds have similarly dismal track records.

If the mutual fund you’ve chosen underperforms, then what? Do you go in search of yet another fund in hopes it will do better? Or perhaps you try your hand at picking individual stocks even though we know investors tend to fare even worse when they try this DIY approach.

In an insightful column, David Booth, Executive Chairman of Dimensional Fund Advisors, acknowledges that the uncertainty of the markets and life is highly challenging for people. However, he also observes that with uncertainty comes opportunity.

“Most of what happens in our lives is unpredictable, and it’s impossible to forecast the future,” Booth writes. “But you can live your life fully without knowing what’s going to happen. And you can have a good investment experience without forecasting what the market is going to do, because you’re not trying to guess which companies will succeed and when. You’re investing in the ingenuity of people to solve problems and make their companies run better.”

While the future course of the markets is impossible to predict, we can control how much risk we take; how broadly we diversify our investments; and who we turn to for financial advice.

When our emotions start to boil, we can remind ourselves that the key to investing success is to remain in markets long enough for compounding to work its magic. Blogger Ben Carlson put it this way: “The bedrock of my investment philosophy is based on the idea that it’s best to think and act for the long-term. But you have to survive the short-term to get to the long-term.”

Your goal should be to make decisions based on a well-structured financial plan and a tried-and-tested evidence-based approach to investing.

Then what? Then, you face the future with courage and optimism and let time do its work.

For more insights on how to navigate the markets, please download our eBook the Seven Deadly Sins of Investing. And if you’re not already a listener of our monthly Capital Topics podcast, I encourage you to download the latest episode and subscribe to receive future episodes.